Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 28 May 2012 22:23:51 +0800
Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Current few cpumask functions' purposes are not quite clear. Stupid
> user like myself need to dig into details for clear function
> purpose and return value.
> Add few explanation for them is helpful.
> 

It appears that Rusty has applied at least some of this patch to
linux-next.  Without reading it ;)

> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *dstp)
>   * cpumask_test_cpu - test for a cpu in a cpumask
>   * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
>   * @cpumask: the cpumask pointer
> + * Returns 1 if the 'cpu' is in the old bitmap of 'cpumask', otherwise returns 0

In kerneldoc we refer to function arguments by prefixing them with a
'@', not by surrounding them with single quotes.  So this should be

* Returns 1 if @cpu is in the old bitmap of @cpumask, otherwise returns 0


And the same applies to the other comments.  So can you please grab the
latest linux-next, prepare a fixup patch and also check that the patch
is complete - not all of your changes have been applied.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/