Re: [PATCH 3/4] OMAP: Define TCA6424 max number of possible IRQs

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
<cmahapatra@xxxxxx> wrote:

> OK, but if your taking this patch through GPIO tree the better if the 4th
> patch is taken through it. TCA6424 fails if both the patches are not
> present.

If the situation is such they should be squashed into one since the
point after the first before the second patch is not bisectable.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/