Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embeddedtree

[Lee Jones]

On 18/07/12 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here,
> > > it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated.
>
> > What's the difference?
>
> > > +- db8500.dtsi       // silicon
> > > \	
> > > +-- snowball.dts    // board
>
> I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks.  Now think how
> that's working for people when they put the configuration for the
> silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board...

Granted, ideally the configuration and silicon description should be 
separated. I don't know that is the case for us yet however. That is 
something I'll enforce when we have a new dts file, which will be coming 
very soon.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/