Re: [PATCH 14/15] workqueue: use mod_delayed_work() instead ofcancel + queue

From: Anton Vorontsov
Date: Sun Jul 29 2012 - 16:57:31 EST


On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:55:07PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Convert delayed_work users doing [__]cancel_delayed_work() +
> queue_delayed_work() to mod_delayed_work().
>
> Most conversions are straight-forward. Ones worth mentioning are,
>
> * drivers/edac/edac_mc.c: edac_mc_workq_setup() converted to always
> use mod_delayed_work() and cancel loop in
> edac_mc_reset_delay_period() is dropped.
>
> * drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c: No need to remember whether
> watchdog is active or not. @fan_watchdog_active and related code
> dropped.
>
> * drivers/power/charger-manager.c: Seemingly a lot of
> delayed_work_pending() abuse going on here.
> [delayed_]work_pending() are unsynchronized and racy when used like
> this. I converted one instance in fullbatt_handler(). Please
> conver the rest so that it invokes workqueue APIs for the intended
> target state rather than trying to game work item pending state
> transitions. e.g. if timer should be modified - call
> mod_delayed_work(), canceled - call cancel_delayed_work[_sync]().
>
> * drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c: thermal_zone_device_set_polling()
> simplified. Note that round_jiffies() calls in this function are
> meaningless. round_jiffies() work on absolute jiffies not delta
> delay used by delayed_work.
>
> * net/core/link_watch.c: linkwatch_schedule_work() was doing a quite
> elaborate dancing around its delayed_work. Collapse it such that
> linkwatch_work is queued for immediate execution if LW_URGENT and
> existing timer is kept otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

drivers/power/ bits:

Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/