Re: [ 39/40] cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrierrelated damage v3

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Jul 30 2012 - 11:39:06 EST


On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:26:09AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > > Thanks, I've merged this with the "original" in the tree, so all should
> > > be good now.
> >
> > Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
> > not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
> > write_seqcount_{begin,end} on set_mems_allowed for the case with
> > CONFIG_CPUSETS, like in the original patch:
> >
>
> Not my finest moment :(
>
> Thanks
>
> ---8<---
> cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3 fix
>
> Missing hunk from backport.
>
> Reported-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> index 8f15695..7a7e5fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,9 @@ static inline bool put_mems_allowed(unsigned int seq)
> static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask)
> {
> task_lock(current);
> + write_seqcount_begin(&current->mems_allowed_seq);
> current->mems_allowed = nodemask;
> + write_seqcount_end(&current->mems_allowed_seq);
> task_unlock(current);
> }

Added to the patch, thanks.

I think with this change, and the others requested, I'll do a -rc2 just
so that people can test it all again.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/