[PATCH RFC] tick: Emphasize tck_broadcast_on_off could only be called for host cpu

From: Feng Tang
Date: Tue Jul 31 2012 - 04:02:15 EST


With current tick_do_broadcast_on_off() and tick_broadcast_on_off(),
it only cares host cpu, and doesn't really support to make the on/off
for another target CPU as it seems to be. So remove the unneeded
online check and add a WARN to notify user who doesn't know this
new usage model.

Next step should be to remove those cases that sends the BROADCAST
ON/OFF/FORCE msg on one cpu for another CPU, if this patch is reviewed
to be ok.

Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 15 +--------------
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 6 +++++-
kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
index f113755..0433274 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void tick_handle_periodic_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev)
* Powerstate information: The system enters/leaves a state, where
* affected devices might stop
*/
-static void tick_do_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long *reason)
+void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long *reason)
{
struct clock_event_device *bc, *dev;
struct tick_device *td;
@@ -266,19 +266,6 @@ out:
}

/*
- * Powerstate information: The system enters/leaves a state, where
- * affected devices might stop.
- */
-void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long reason, int *oncpu)
-{
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(*oncpu, cpu_online_mask))
- printk(KERN_ERR "tick-broadcast: ignoring broadcast for "
- "offline CPU #%d\n", *oncpu);
- else
- tick_do_broadcast_on_off(&reason);
-}
-
-/*
* Set the periodic handler depending on broadcast on/off
*/
void tick_set_periodic_handler(struct clock_event_device *dev, int broadcast)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index da6c9ec..950c635 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -362,6 +362,8 @@ static void tick_resume(void)
static int tick_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long reason,
void *dev)
{
+ int *cpu = dev;
+
switch (reason) {

case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_ADD:
@@ -370,7 +372,9 @@ static int tick_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long reason,
case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON:
case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_OFF:
case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_FORCE:
- tick_broadcast_on_off(reason, dev);
+ WARN((*cpu != smp_processor_id()),
+ "BROADCAST ON/OFF/FORCE should only be fired for host CPU\n");
+ tick_broadcast_on_off(&reason);
break;

case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER:
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index 4e265b9..40e4a8b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static inline bool tick_broadcast_oneshot_available(void) { return false; }
extern int tick_device_uses_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev, int cpu);
extern int tick_check_broadcast_device(struct clock_event_device *dev);
extern int tick_is_broadcast_device(struct clock_event_device *dev);
-extern void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long reason, int *oncpu);
+extern void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long *reason);
extern void tick_shutdown_broadcast(unsigned int *cpup);
extern void tick_suspend_broadcast(void);
extern int tick_resume_broadcast(void);
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static inline int tick_device_uses_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev,
return 0;
}
static inline void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *d) { }
-static inline void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long reason, int *oncpu) { }
+static inline void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long *reason) { }
static inline void tick_shutdown_broadcast(unsigned int *cpup) { }
static inline void tick_suspend_broadcast(void) { }
static inline int tick_resume_broadcast(void) { return 0; }
--
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/