Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable

[Tejun Heo]

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:41:56AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> How would your DEFINE_HASHTABLE look like if we got for the simple
> 'struct hash_table' approach?

I think defining a different enclosing anonymous struct which the
requested number of array entries and then aliasing the actual
hash_table to that symbol should work.  It's rather horrible and I'm
not sure it's worth the trouble.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/