Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] block: Add bio_clone_bioset()

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:40PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This consolidates some code, and will help in a later patch changing how
> bio cloning works.

I think it would be better to introduce bio_clone*() functions in a
separate patch and convert the users in a different one.

>  /**
> - *	bio_clone	-	clone a bio
> + *	bio_clone_bioset -	clone a bio
>   *	@bio: bio to clone
>   *	@gfp_mask: allocation priority
> + *	@bs: bio_set to allocate from
>   *
>   * 	Like __bio_clone, only also allocates the returned bio
>   */
> -struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +struct bio *bio_clone_bioset(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> +			     struct bio_set *bs)
>  {
> -	struct bio *b = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, bio->bi_max_vecs);
> +	struct bio *b = bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_mask, bio->bi_max_vecs, bs);
>  
>  	if (!b)
>  		return NULL;
> @@ -485,7 +487,7 @@ struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  	if (bio_integrity(bio)) {
>  		int ret;
>  
> -		ret = bio_integrity_clone(b, bio, gfp_mask, fs_bio_set);
> +		ret = bio_integrity_clone(b, bio, gfp_mask, bs);
>  
>  		if (ret < 0) {
>  			bio_put(b);
> @@ -495,6 +497,12 @@ struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  
>  	return b;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone_bioset);
> +
> +struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> +	return bio_clone_bioset(bio, gfp_mask, fs_bio_set);
> +}

So, bio_clone() loses its function comment.  Also, does it even make
sense to call bio_clone() from fs_bio_set?  Let's say it's so, then
what's the difference from using _kmalloc variant?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/