Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] block: Add bio_clone_bioset()

From: Kent Overstreet
Date: Wed Aug 08 2012 - 22:56:45 EST


On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:40PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > This consolidates some code, and will help in a later patch changing how
> > bio cloning works.
>
> I think it would be better to introduce bio_clone*() functions in a
> separate patch and convert the users in a different one.
>
> > /**
> > - * bio_clone - clone a bio
> > + * bio_clone_bioset - clone a bio
> > * @bio: bio to clone
> > * @gfp_mask: allocation priority
> > + * @bs: bio_set to allocate from
> > *
> > * Like __bio_clone, only also allocates the returned bio
> > */
> > -struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +struct bio *bio_clone_bioset(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + struct bio_set *bs)
> > {
> > - struct bio *b = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, bio->bi_max_vecs);
> > + struct bio *b = bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_mask, bio->bi_max_vecs, bs);
> >
> > if (!b)
> > return NULL;
> > @@ -485,7 +487,7 @@ struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > if (bio_integrity(bio)) {
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = bio_integrity_clone(b, bio, gfp_mask, fs_bio_set);
> > + ret = bio_integrity_clone(b, bio, gfp_mask, bs);
> >
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > bio_put(b);
> > @@ -495,6 +497,12 @@ struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >
> > return b;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone_bioset);
> > +
> > +struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > + return bio_clone_bioset(bio, gfp_mask, fs_bio_set);
> > +}
>
> So, bio_clone() loses its function comment. Also, does it even make
> sense to call bio_clone() from fs_bio_set?

I'll re add the function comment if you want, just for a single line
wrapper I don't know if it's worth the cost - comments get out of date,
and they're more stuff to wade through.

> Let's say it's so, then
> what's the difference from using _kmalloc variant?

bio_kmalloc() fails if nr_iovecs > 1024, bio_alloc_bioset() fails if
nr_iovecs > 256

and bio_alloc_bioset() is mempool backed, bio_kmalloc() is not.

AFAICT that's it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/