Re: [Regression] "x86-64/efi: Use EFI to deal with platform wallclock" prevents my machine from booting

[Matt Fleming]

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 11:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > 
> > I managed to find a machine to reproduce this on and it looks like the
> > ASUS firmware engineers are upto their old tricks of referencing
> > physical addresses after we've taken control of the memory map,
> 
> Yippie. On such systems we simply can't do any runtime calls.
> Should we add a command line option forcing efi_native to false,
> thus suppressing all runtime calls? Or would the "noefi" one be
> enough already?

I think a better solution for this, seeing as there appear to be *so*
many ASUS machines in the wild with this inability to do virtual EFI
calls, is to provide a 1:1 mapping as well as our regular virt->phys
mapping for the benefit of the firmware. We can load our special page
table in efi_call_*, etc.

One thing to note is that because of breakage seen on Apple machines
last time Matthew tried this approach, we (the kernel) can't actually
access the 1:1 mapping, it would exist purely for the benefit of
firmware that was broken enough to reference physical addresses after
SetVirtualAddressMap().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/