Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might
> > > be a better solution.
> > >
> > > [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that
> > > are being mapped
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540
> > Actually, apply that series of 5 patches.
>
> I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip.
>
> However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying
> the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that.  On the other
> hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway.

Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's 
legitimate request for minor code restructuring.  Other than that, the 
patchset is really The Right Thing.

	-hpa


--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/