Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] perf/events: Use helper functions in eventassignment to shrink macro size

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Aug 13 2012 - 10:40:39 EST


On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 15:52 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Looking at the history of perf_trace_buf_submit(), it use to be more
> > than one function call. But when you inlined
> > perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(), it became just a one2one mapping.
>
> Right.

OK, this should go as a separate change.

>
> > I'm assuming that we want to convert all calls to
> > perf_trace_buf_submit()s into perf_tp_event()?
>
> Yeah.. I think you're referring to the {u,k}probes open-coded nonsense?
> Should we make those use these new helpers you created as well?

They may not need it. The helpers I created were for the macros that are
created by all TRACE_EVENT() instances. If the uprobes and kprobes only
have a single instance, then they probably don't need the helpers. But
they still call the perf_trace_buf_submit(), which can can probably be
cleaned up.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/