Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] floppy: avoid leaking extra reference to queueon do_floppy_init error handling

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Tue Aug 14 2012 - 10:28:18 EST


On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 11:03 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:20:39AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 15:16 -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > > After commit 3f9a5aa ("floppy: Cleanup disk->queue before caling
> > > put_disk() if add_disk() was never called"), if something fails in the
> > > add_disk loop, we unconditionally set disks[dr]->queue to NULL. But
> > > that's wrong, since we may have succesfully done an add_disk on some of
> > > the drives previously in the loop, and in this case we would end up with
> > > an extra reference to the disks[dr]->queue.
> > >
> > > Add a new global array to mark "registered" disks, and use that to check
> > > if we did an add_disk on one of the disks already. Using an array to
> > > track added disks also will help to simplify/cleanup code later, as
> > > suggested by Vivek Goyal.
> > [...]
> >
> > It's totally ridiculous that a driver should have to do this. Any
> > registered disk should have the GENHD_FL_UP flag set... so why can't
> > genhd check it? It doesn't look like floppy is the only driver affected
> > by this problem, either. So I suggest the following general fix
> > (untested):
> >
> > ---
> > Subject: genhd: Make put_disk() safe for disks that have not been registered
> >
> > Since commit 9f53d2f ('block: fix __blkdev_get and add_disk race
> > condition'), add_disk() adds a reference to disk->queue,
>
> I do not see this? Commit 9f53d2fe insert disk_alloc_events() to add_disk(),
> but disk_alloc_events() function does not get any reference to disk->queue,
> I missed something?

Sorry, not sure why I pointed to that one. The reference should of
course be to:

commit 523e1d399ce0e23bec562abe2b2f8d297af81161
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Oct 19 14:31:07 2011 +0200

block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part