Re: yama_ptrace_access_check(): possible recursive locking detected

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 22:56 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> So Oleg's suggestion of removing the locking around the reading of
> ->comm is wrong since it really does need the lock. 

There's tons of code reading comm without locking.. you're saying that
all is broken?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/