Re: [PATCH v2 03/31] arm64: Exception handling

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION
> +#define compat_thumb_mode(regs) \
> +	(((regs)->pstate & COMPAT_PSR_T_BIT))
> +#else
> +#define compat_thumb_mode(regs) (0)
> +#endif

The symbol we use on other platforms is CONFIG_COMPAT. I don't think you
need to have a separate CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION

> +void __bad_xchg(volatile void *ptr, int size)
> +{
> +	printk("xchg: bad data size: pc 0x%p, ptr 0x%p, size %d\n",
> +		__builtin_return_address(0), ptr, size);
> +	BUG();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bad_xchg);
> +

I think we're better off not defining this function. My guess is that
initially the idea on ARM was that it was meant as a BUILD_BUG_ON
replacement, but the someone added this function. And you copied it.

Microblaze has the same declaration, but (correctly) misses the
definition, which produces a much more helpful link failure than
a run-time BUG(). Using BUILD_BUG_ON would be even better.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/