Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: socket bind to file descriptor introduced

[Eric W. Biederman]

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 08/15/2012 12:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> There is also the trick of getting a shorter directory name using
>> /proc/self/fd if you are threaded and can't change the directory.
>> 
>> The obvious choices at this point are
>> - Teach bind and connect and af_unix sockets to take longer AF_UNIX
>>   socket path names.
>> 
>> - introduce sockaddr_fd that can be applied to AF_UNIX sockets,
>>   and teach unix_bind and unix_connect how to deal with a second type of sockaddr.
>>   struct sockaddr_fd { short fd_family; short pad; int fd; };
>> 
>> - introduce sockaddr_unix_at that takes a directory file descriptor
>>   as well as a unix path, and teach unix_bind and unix_connect to deal with a
>>   second sockaddr type.
>>   struct sockaddr_unix_at { short family; short pad; int dfd; char path[102]; }
>>   AF_UNIX_AT
>> 
>> I don't know what the implications of for breaking connect up into 3
>> system calls and changing the semantics are and I would really rather
>> not have to think about it.
>> 
>> But it certainly does not look to me like you introduce new systems
>> calls to do what you want.
>> 
>
> How would you distinguish the new sockaddr types from the traditional
> one?  New AF_?

Yeah.  AF_FD or AF_UNIX_AT is what I was thinking.  The way the code
falls out that should be compartively simple to implement.

recvmsg etc would give you sockaddr_un sockets when they come from the
kernel.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/