Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: socket bind to file descriptor introduced

From: J. Bruce Fields
Date: Thu Aug 16 2012 - 09:55:01 EST


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:03:24PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > This patch set introduces new socket operation and new system call:
> > sys_fbind(), which allows to bind socket to opened file.
> > File to bind to can be created by sys_mknod(S_IFSOCK) and opened by
> > open(O_PATH).
> >
> > This system call is especially required for UNIX sockets, which has name
> > lenght limitation.
> >
> > The following series implements...
>
> Hmm. I just realized this patchset is even sillier than I thought.
>
> Stanislav is the problem you are ultimately trying to solve nfs clients
> in a container connecting to the wrong user space rpciod?
>
> Aka net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:xs_setup_local only taking an absolute path
> and then creating a delayed work item to actually open the unix domain
> socket?
>
> The straight correct and straight forward thing to do appears to be:
> - Capture the root from current->fs in xs_setup_local.
> - In xs_local_finish_connect change current->fs.root to the captured
> version of root before kernel_connect, and restore current->fs.root
> after kernel_connect.

Ah, yep, that should do it.

--b.

>
> It might not be a bad idea to implement open on unix domain sockets in
> a filesystem as create(AF_LOCAL)+connect() which would allow you to
> replace __sock_create + kernel_connect with a simple file_open_root.
>
> But I think the simple scheme of:
> struct path old_root;
> old_root = current->fs.root;
> kernel_connect(...);
> current->fs.root = old_root;
>
> Is more than sufficient and will remove the need for anything
> except a purely local change to get nfs clients to connect from
> containers.
>
> Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/