Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode_fh helper

From: Al Viro
Date: Thu Aug 16 2012 - 11:05:38 EST


On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:57:00PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

> Guys, would the patch below be more-less acceptible?
> In inotify I think we could pass "parent" as NULL and use general
> encode engine then (ie it will look like someone called for
> name_to_handle_at on inotify target).

Wait. What the hell are you going to do with those afterwards?
Again, there's a shitload of filesystems that cannot be exported
over NFS, exactly because there's no way to implement sanely
working fhandles. And idiotify is allowed for all of them.

You *can't* decode anything fhandle-like on e.g. sysfs. Or procfs.
Or configfs. Or any network filesystem (I'd argue that we should simply
ban idiotify on those, but good luck doing that). You *can* do that
for FAT derivatives, but only if you have parent directory when creating
that sucker.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/