Re: [PATCH] twl4030: It would be better not to use the 0b-prefix.

From: NeilBrown
Date: Fri Aug 17 2012 - 05:31:03 EST


On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:49:43 +0900 Il Han <corone.il.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It would be better not to use the 0b-prefix for earlier versions of gcc-4.3.
> Please, Modify it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Il Han <corone.il.han@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/power/twl4030_charger.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/twl4030_charger.c b/drivers/power/twl4030_charger.c
> index 15f4d5d..8d6bc68 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/twl4030_charger.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/twl4030_charger.c
> @@ -41,16 +41,16 @@
> #define TWL4030_STS_VBUS BIT(7)
> #define TWL4030_STS_USB_ID BIT(2)
> #define TWL4030_BBCHEN BIT(4)
> -#define TWL4030_BBSEL_MASK 0b1100
> -#define TWL4030_BBSEL_2V5 0b0000
> -#define TWL4030_BBSEL_3V0 0b0100
> -#define TWL4030_BBSEL_3V1 0b1000
> -#define TWL4030_BBSEL_3V2 0b1100
> -#define TWL4030_BBISEL_MASK 0b11
> -#define TWL4030_BBISEL_25uA 0b00
> -#define TWL4030_BBISEL_150uA 0b01
> -#define TWL4030_BBISEL_500uA 0b10
> -#define TWL4030_BBISEL_1000uA 0b11
> +#define TWL4030_BBSEL_MASK 0x0c
> +#define TWL4030_BBSEL_2V5 0x00
> +#define TWL4030_BBSEL_3V0 0x04
> +#define TWL4030_BBSEL_3V1 0x08
> +#define TWL4030_BBSEL_3V2 0x0c
> +#define TWL4030_BBISEL_MASK 0x03
> +#define TWL4030_BBISEL_25uA 0x00
> +#define TWL4030_BBISEL_150uA 0x01
> +#define TWL4030_BBISEL_500uA 0x02
> +#define TWL4030_BBISEL_1000uA 0x03
>
> /* BCI interrupts */
> #define TWL4030_WOVF BIT(0) /* Watchdog overflow */

Thanks. I'd been meaning to send that patch, but life got in the way
recently.

Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature