Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode_fh helper

From: J. Bruce Fields
Date: Mon Aug 20 2012 - 15:32:05 EST


On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:06:06PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:49:23PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > > Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > To provide fsnotify object inodes being watched without
> > > > > binding to alphabetical path we need to encode them with
> > > > > exportfs help. This patch adds a helper which operates
> > > > > with plain inodes directly.
> > > >
> > > > doesn't name_to_handle_at() work for you ? It also allows to get a file
> > > > handle using file descriptor.
> > >
> > > Hi, sorry for dealy. Well, the last idea is to get rid of this helper,
> > > I've sent out an updated version where ino+dev is only printed.
> >
> > I don't understand how ino and dev are useful to you, though, if you're
> > still hoping to be able to look up inodes using this information later
> > on.
>
> Hi Bruce, I believe having ino+dev is better than nothing. Otherwise we
> simply have no clue which targets are bound to inotify mark. Sometime
> (!) we can try to generate fhandle in userspace from this ino+dev bundle
> and then open the target file.

That's insufficient to generate a filehandle in general.

(Also: there's the usual inode-number aliasing problem: the inode number
could get reused by another file. Unless you know the file is being
held open the whole time.)

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/