Re: [PATCH 4/7] regulator: anatop-regulator: convert to useimx-syscon to access anatop register

[Richard Zhao]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:21:03PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:18 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
> 
> > @@ -109,7 +110,11 @@ static int __devinit anatop_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	rdesc->ops = &anatop_rops;
> >  	rdesc->type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
> >  	rdesc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > -	sreg->mfd = anatopmfd;
> > +
> > +	sreg->anatop = of_parse_phandle(np, "fsl,anatop", 0);
> > +	if (!sreg->anatop)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> 
> In fact, that imx_syscon_lookup function I proposed could even do the
> of_parse_phandle() internally, so perhaps:
> 
> foo->syscon_dev = imx_syscon_lookup(np, "fsl,anatop", 0);
> if (IS_ERR(foo->syscon_dev))
>     return PTR_ERR(foo->syscon_dev);
> 
> with imx_syscon_lookup() internally knowing when to return EPROBE_DEFER
> rather than any other permanent error code (e.g. for missing property,
> bad phandle, etc.)
In some case that we access register in machine code, we don't have any
phandler. The node is got by find compatible or by path.

Thanks
Richard 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/