Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:59:11PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> This patch uses pr_* instead of printk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> index ba126cc..e38d990 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
>  #ifndef DEBUG_GPIO
>  #define gpio_dbg(x...) do { } while (0)
>  #else
> -#define gpio_dbg(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
> +#define gpio_dbg(x...) pr_debug(x)
>  #endif
>  
>  int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
> @@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>  	if (chip->pm != NULL) {
>  		if (!chip->pm->save || !chip->pm->resume)
> -			printk(KERN_ERR "gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
> +			pr_err("gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
>  			       gc->label);

I would rather see dev_* conversion instead.

my 2 cents

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature