Re: [PATCH] genirq: Add the IRQS_ONESHOT support for edge interrupt

[anish singh]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Liu, Chuansheng
<chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This comment might help.
>> kernel/irq/manage.c
>>
>>     } else if (new->handler == irq_default_primary_handler) {
>>
>>         /*
>>          * The interrupt was requested with handler = NULL, so
>>          * we use the default primary handler for it. But it
>>          * does not have the oneshot flag set. In combination
>>          * with level interrupts this is deadly, because the
>>          * default primary handler just wakes the thread, then
>>          * the irq lines is reenabled, but the device still
>>          * has the level irq asserted. Rinse and repeat....
>>          *
>>          * While this works for edge type interrupts, we play
>>          * it safe and reject unconditionally because we can't
>>          * say for sure which type this interrupt really
>>          * has. The type flags are unreliable as the
>>          * underlying chip implementation can override them.
>>          */
>
> This is not my case. My request_irq is as below:
> request_threaded_irq(drv_data->irq,
>                                           func1,
>                                           func2,
>                                           IRQF_SHARED|IRQS_ONESHOT ,
>                                           "AAAA",
>                                           drv_data);

I hope you are disabling the interrupt in your primary handler and returning
IRQ_WAKE_THREAD.
If yes then someone with experience in this interrupt handling code
can help you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/