Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected

[Linus Torvalds]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 08:52 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Your patch looks odd, though. Why do you use some complex initial
>> value for 'candidate' (nr_cpu_ids) instead of a simple and readable
>> one (-1)?
>
> nr_cpu_ids is the typical no-value value for cpumask operations -- yes
> this is annoying and I keep doing it wrong far too often.

Can we please just fix it? Making the excuse that it's the "typical
no-value" is still stupid, because it's a f*cking moronic no-value.

Whoever thinks that it's smart to test against "nr_cpu_ids" when
there's a much more natural value (-1) is crazy. The source code looks
more complex, but the code it *generates* is clearly more complex and
worse too.

Sure, the "scan bits" bitops will return ">= nr_cpu_ids" for the "I
couldn't find a bit" thing, but that doesn't mean that everything else
should.

            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/