Re: divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Sep 24 2012 - 14:19:28 EST


On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:16:50PM +0200, Conny Seidel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:36:09 +0200
> Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >[ â ]
> >
> >Conny, would you test pls?
>
> Sure thing.
> Out of ~25 runs I only triggered it once, without the patch the
> trigger-rate is higher.
>
> [ 55.098249] Broke affinity for irq 81
> [ 55.105108] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
> [ 55.311216] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x11
> [ 55.333022] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
> [ 55.545877] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
> [ 55.753050] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x12
> [ 55.775582] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
> [ 55.986747] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
> [ 56.193839] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 3 APIC 0x13
> [ 56.212643] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
> [ 56.423201] Got negative events: -25

I see it:

__percpu_counter_sum does for_each_online_cpu without doing
get/put_online_cpus().

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/