Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Handle undercommitted guest case in PLEhandler

From: Gleb Natapov
Date: Thu Sep 27 2012 - 06:00:33 EST


On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:33:56AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 11:11 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>
> >> User return notifier is per-cpu, not per-task. There is a new task_work
> >> (<linux/task_work.h>) that does what you want. With these
> >> technicalities out of the way, I think it's the wrong idea. If a vcpu
> >> thread is in userspace, that doesn't mean it's preempted, there's no
> >> point in boosting it if it's already running.
> >>
> > Ah, so you want to set bit in kvm->preempted_vcpus if task is _not_
> > TASK_RUNNING in sched_out (you wrote opposite in your email)? If a task
> > is in userspace it is definitely not preempted.
>
> No, as I originally wrote. If it's TASK_RUNNING when it saw sched_out,
> then it is preempted (i.e. runnable), not sleeping on some waitqueue,
> voluntarily (HLT) or involuntarily (page fault).
>
Of course, I got it all backwards. Need more coffee.

> >
> >> btw, we can have secondary effects. A vcpu can be waiting for a lock in
> >> the host kernel, or for a host page fault. There's no point in boosting
> >> anything for that. Or a vcpu in userspace can be waiting for a lock
> >> that is held by another thread, which has been preempted.
> > Do you mean userspace spinlock? Because otherwise task that's waits on
> > a kernel lock will sleep in the kernel.
>
> I meant a kernel mutex.
>
> vcpu 0: take guest spinlock
> vcpu 0: vmexit
> vcpu 0: spin_lock(some_lock)
> vcpu 1: take same guest spinlock
> vcpu 1: PLE vmexit
> vcpu 1: wtf?
>
> Waiting on a host kernel spinlock is not too bad because we expect to be
> out shortly. Waiting on a host kernel mutex can be a lot worse.
>
We can't do much about it without PV spinlock since there is not
information about what vcpu holds which guest spinlock, no?

--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/