[PATCH 0/7] PM / QoS: Support for PM QoS device flags

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi All,

On Friday 28 of September 2012 23:51:10 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> The following patch series extends the existing device PM QoS core code to
> support PM QoS flags representing binary (on/off) requirements, such as
> whether or not power may be removed entirely from the device or whether
> or not remote wakeup (i.e. signalling of external events while suspended)
> should work for it.
> 
> [1/7] Prepare PM QoS device structure for adding more constraint types.
> [2/7] Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags.
> [3/7] Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for representing more request types. 
> [4/7] Introduce device PM QoS flags support.
> [5/7] Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space.
> [6/7] PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff().
> [7/7] PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account.
> 
> The last two patches make the generic PM domains framework and ACPI / PCI,
> respectively, take the PM QoS device flags introduced by patch [5/7] into
> accont when making their decisions.
> 
> The changelogs describe the details, but if anything isn't clear, please let
> me know.

Time for a real submission, it seems. :-)

The changes since the previous iteration are addressed comments and a small
optimization in patch [5/7] (it won't resume the device if the setting is not
going to change in dev_pm_qos_update_flags()).

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/