Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] TPM: Let the tpm char device be openablemultiple times

[Alan Cox]

On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:39:45 -0600
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 08:35:09AM +0000, Peter.Huewe@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > 
> > > Using open/close is an interesting idea, but it wouldn't work. open()
> > > is coded to return EBUSY if another process has it open, rather than
> > > block, and spinning on open would be unacceptable.
> > 
> > Hmm, maybe write a small pass through program which opens /dev/tpm
> > once and accepts its data via a socket or pipe?
> 
> I believe the kernel should not be enforcing this kind of policy into
> userspace. Plus, some of our embedded system are memory constrained
> so an unnecessary process is not welcome..

Sane device drivers for devices where contention is meaningful block on
an open that is busy, or return an error if the O_NONBLOCK option is
specified. That's the normal case.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/