Re: [PATCH] rcu: restore correct batch limiting

[Eric Dumazet]

On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 21:18 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:

> >                                         /* did other CPU force QS recently? */
> > -       long            blimit;         /* Upper limit on a processed batch */
> > +       int             blimit;         /* Upper limit on a processed batch */
> >
> >         /* 3) dynticks interface. */
> > +       int             dynticks_snap;  /* Per-GP tracking for dynticks. */
> >         struct rcu_dynticks *dynticks;  /* Shared per-CPU dynticks state. */
> > -       int dynticks_snap;              /* Per-GP tracking for dynticks. */
> 
> Hm, no words in change log for shuffling dynticks_snap...

I dont like adding two 32bit holes on a structure ;)

This kind of trivial things dont need a changelog, especially when
fixing a critical bug.

I let Paul add this if he really wants.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/