Re: [PATCH] remove untouched code in kfifo_in

From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Wed Oct 17 2012 - 10:05:14 EST


On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Richard Yang wrote:

> >> This patch just remove this code.
> >> ---
> >> include/linux/kfifo.h | 4 ----
> >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/kfifo.h b/include/linux/kfifo.h
> >> index 10308c6..e7015bb 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/kfifo.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/kfifo.h
> >> @@ -512,10 +512,6 @@ __kfifo_uint_must_check_helper( \
> >> unsigned long __n = (n); \
> >> const size_t __recsize = sizeof(*__tmp->rectype); \
> >> struct __kfifo *__kfifo = &__tmp->kfifo; \
> >> - if (0) { \
> >> - typeof(__tmp->ptr_const) __dummy __attribute__ ((unused)); \
> >> - __dummy = (typeof(__buf))NULL; \
> >> - } \
> >> (__recsize) ?\
> >> __kfifo_in_r(__kfifo, __buf, __n, __recsize) : \
> >> __kfifo_in(__kfifo, __buf, __n); \
> >
> >Frankly, I'd first like to understand what was the rationale for adding it
> >at the first place. Adding Stefani and lkml to CC.
>
> Agree.
>
> BTW, by git blame, I just see commit 2e956fb3 which is checked in by Stefani.
> While looking in the diff, the kfifo_in() is already there. Looks like this
> commit move the definition from one file to another file.
>
> So I am not sure the if(0) code is added by Stefani. Any other method to trace
> the ealier history?

git blame -- include/linux/kfifo-new.h 2e956fb3~1

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/