Re: [PATCH 1/6] memcg: split mem_cgroup_force_empty intoreclaiming and reparenting parts
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Oct 18 2012 - 17:56:53 EST
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:30:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> mem_cgroup_force_empty did two separate things depending on free_all
> parameter from the very beginning. It either reclaimed as many pages as
> possible and moved the rest to the parent or just moved charges to the
> parent. The first variant is used as memory.force_empty callback while
> the later is used from the mem_cgroup_pre_destroy.
> The whole games around gotos are far from being nice and there is no
> reason to keep those two functions inside one. Let's split them and
> also move the responsibility for css reference counting to their callers
> to make to code easier.
> This patch doesn't have any functional changes.
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/