Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Oct 24 2012 - 02:07:12 EST


On 22 October 2012 14:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20 October 2012 01:42, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Initially ondemand governor was written and then using its code conservative
>> governor is written. It used a lot of code from ondemand governor, but copy of
>> code was created instead of using the same routines from both governors. Which
>> increased code redundancy, which is difficult to manage.
>>
>> This patch is an attempt to move common part of both the governors to
>> cpufreq_governor.c file to come over above mentioned issues.
>>
>> This shouldn't change anything from functionality point of view.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

For everybody else, this patch is already pushed by Rafael in his linux-next
branch.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/