Re: [PATCH] rbtree: include linux/compiler.h for definition of__always_inline

[Ingo Molnar]

* Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:56:21PM +0100, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > rb_erase_augmented is a static function annotated with __always_inline.
> > > This causes a compile failure when attempting to use the rbtree
> > > implementation as a library (e.g. kvm tool):
> > >
> > > rbtree_augmented.h:125:24: error: expected ???=???, ???,???, ???;???, ???asm??? or ???__attribute__??? before ???void???
> > >
> > > This patch includes linux/compiler.h in rbtree_augmented.h so that the
> > > __always_inline macro is resolved correctly.
> > >
> > > Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Just curious - what are you going to implement with augmented rbtrees
> > in kvm tool ?
> > 
> > If the basic rbtree or the interval tree implementations are
> > sufficient for your usage, you should try using that (in which case
> > you won't need this header fix).
> 
> kvm tool uses interval rbtrees for things like keeping track 
> of virtual devices, although it looks like Ingo implemented 
> the augment callbacks while moving to -rc1.

Yeah, latest kvmtool uses the modern augmented-rbtree facility 
of the kernel.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/