sched: correct the comments for tick_sched_timer()

From: Chuansheng Liu
Date: Wed Oct 24 2012 - 04:07:45 EST



In the comments of function tick_sched_timer(), the sentence
"timer->base->cpu_base->lock held" is not right.

In function __run_hrtimer(), before call timer->function(),
the cpu_base->lock has been unlocked.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index a402608..2bc73d3 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ void tick_check_idle(int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
/*
* We rearm the timer until we get disabled by the idle code.
- * Called with interrupts disabled and timer->base->cpu_base->lock held.
+ * Called with interrupts disabled.
*/
static enum hrtimer_restart tick_sched_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
{
--
1.7.0.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/