Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: return early from __cpufreq_driver_getavg()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 20 of October 2012 10:12:07 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2012 3:37 AM, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday 20 of October 2012 01:42:05 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > There is no need to do cpufreq_get_cpu() and cpufreq_put_cpu() for
> drivers that
> > > don't support getavg() routine.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The patch doesn't seem to follow the changelog or the other way around.
> 
> Sorry if my log isn't clear enough.
> But i could still see it matching the code :)
> 
> I have moved the check for drivers capabilities at the top
> of routine, so that there is no need to call mentioned routines.

OK

Applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next as v3.8 material.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/