Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support

[Viresh Kumar]

Hi Vinod,

On 16 October 2012 09:49, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> dw_dmac driver already supports device tree but it used to have its platform
> data passed the non-DT way.
>
> This patch does following changes:
> - pass platform data via DT, non-DT way still takes precedence if both are used.
> - create generic filter routine
> - Earlier slave information was made available by slave specific filter routines
>   in chan->private field. Now, this information would be passed from within dmac
>   DT node. Slave drivers would now be required to pass bus_id (a string) as
>   parameter to this generic filter(), which would be compared against the slave
>   data passed from DT, by the generic filter routine.
> - Update binding document

I can see that you applied these patches and they are present in
linux-next. But i feel
the order of patches is bad.

git log --oneline gives following:

879a0ec dmaengine: dw_dmac: Update documentation style comments for
dw_dma_platform_data
d0e35f3 dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
4c4c30c ARM: SPEAr13xx: Pass DW DMAC platform data from DT

The last patch "ARM: SPEAr13xx: Pass DW DMAC platform data from DT" has
dependency on second patch.

The correct order would be:
4c4c30c ARM: SPEAr13xx: Pass DW DMAC platform data from DT
d0e35f3 dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
879a0ec dmaengine: dw_dmac: Update documentation style comments for
dw_dma_platform_data


PS: We are looking at output of git log. Last patch (or first from
bottom) was applied first.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/