Re: [PATCH RFC] pkt_sched: enable QFQ to support TSO/GSO

From: Cong Wang
Date: Mon Oct 29 2012 - 07:08:29 EST


On 10/29/2012 04:51 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
Hi,
if the max packet size for some class (configured through tc) is
violated by the actual size of the packets of that class, then QFQ
would not schedule classes correctly, and the data structures
implementing the bucket lists may get corrupted. This problem occurs
with TSO/GSO even if the max packet size is set to the MTU, and is,
e.g., the cause of the failure reported in [1]. Two patches have been
proposed to solve this problem in [2], one of them is a preliminary
version of this patch.

This patch addresses the above issues by: 1) setting QFQ parameters to
proper values for supporting TSO/GSO (in particular, setting the
maximum possible packet size to 64KB), 2) automatically increasing the
max packet size for a class, lmax, when a packet with a larger size
than the current value of lmax arrives (a notification is also appended
to the log).

The drawback of the first point is that the maximum weight for a class
is now limited to 4096, which is equal to 1/16 of the maximum weight
sum.

Finally, this patch also forcibly caps the timestamps of a class if
they are too high to be stored in the bucket list. This capping, taken
from QFQ+ [3], handles the unfrequent case described in the comment to
the function slot_insert.

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=134968777902077&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135096573507936&w=2
[3] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=134902691421670&w=2

Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>


Please respect people who helps you to test it:

Tested-by: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>

I tested it again just in case...

By the way, one nit below:


+ if (unlikely(cl->lmax < qdisc_pkt_len(skb))) {
+ pr_notice("qfq: increasing maxpkt from %u to %u for class %u",
+ cl->lmax, qdisc_pkt_len(skb), cl->common.classid);
+ qfq_update_reactivate_class(q, cl, cl->inv_w,
+ qdisc_pkt_len(skb), 0);
+ }


Seems the log level KERN_NOTICE is overkill, normal users don't care about these information, so s/pr_notice/pr_debug/.


Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/