Re: [PATCH 0/2] irq_work: A couple fixes

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 17:25 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> No I was worried about the cpu_relax() in irq_work_sync()

That one is fine too, as this is the purpose of cpu_relax(). Not only to
relax the cpu, but also to tell gcc that the loop needs to be reread.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/