[PATCH v8 10/16] dlm: use new hashtable implementation

From: Sasha Levin
Date: Tue Oct 30 2012 - 14:47:45 EST


Switch dlm to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of
generic unrelated code in the dlm.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
index 331ea4f..19acdfe 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
#include <net/sctp/sctp.h>
#include <net/sctp/user.h>
#include <net/ipv6.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>

#include "dlm_internal.h"
#include "lowcomms.h"
@@ -62,7 +63,7 @@
#include "config.h"

#define NEEDED_RMEM (4*1024*1024)
-#define CONN_HASH_SIZE 32
+#define CONN_HASH_BITS 5

/* Number of messages to send before rescheduling */
#define MAX_SEND_MSG_COUNT 25
@@ -158,34 +159,27 @@ static int dlm_allow_conn;
static struct workqueue_struct *recv_workqueue;
static struct workqueue_struct *send_workqueue;

-static struct hlist_head connection_hash[CONN_HASH_SIZE];
+/*
+ * On a sidenote, hash function could be very simple because most clusters
+ * have simple sequential nodeids, so we should be able to go straight to
+ * a connection struct in the array. We don't utilize it at the moment,
+ * but it's something work to keep in mind.
+ */
+static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(connection_hash, CONN_HASH_BITS);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(connections_lock);
static struct kmem_cache *con_cache;

static void process_recv_sockets(struct work_struct *work);
static void process_send_sockets(struct work_struct *work);

-
-/* This is deliberately very simple because most clusters have simple
- sequential nodeids, so we should be able to go straight to a connection
- struct in the array */
-static inline int nodeid_hash(int nodeid)
-{
- return nodeid & (CONN_HASH_SIZE-1);
-}
-
static struct connection *__find_con(int nodeid)
{
- int r;
struct hlist_node *h;
struct connection *con;

- r = nodeid_hash(nodeid);
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(con, h, &connection_hash[r], list) {
+ hash_for_each_possible(connection_hash, con, h, list, nodeid)
if (con->nodeid == nodeid)
return con;
- }
return NULL;
}

@@ -196,7 +190,6 @@ static struct connection *__find_con(int nodeid)
static struct connection *__nodeid2con(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc)
{
struct connection *con = NULL;
- int r;

con = __find_con(nodeid);
if (con || !alloc)
@@ -206,8 +199,7 @@ static struct connection *__nodeid2con(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc)
if (!con)
return NULL;

- r = nodeid_hash(nodeid);
- hlist_add_head(&con->list, &connection_hash[r]);
+ hash_add(connection_hash, &con->list, nodeid);

con->nodeid = nodeid;
mutex_init(&con->sock_mutex);
@@ -235,11 +227,8 @@ static void foreach_conn(void (*conn_func)(struct connection *c))
struct hlist_node *h, *n;
struct connection *con;

- for (i = 0; i < CONN_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- hlist_for_each_entry_safe(con, h, n, &connection_hash[i], list){
- conn_func(con);
- }
- }
+ hash_for_each_safe(connection_hash, i, h, n, con, list)
+ conn_func(con);
}

static struct connection *nodeid2con(int nodeid, gfp_t allocation)
@@ -262,12 +251,10 @@ static struct connection *assoc2con(int assoc_id)

mutex_lock(&connections_lock);

- for (i = 0 ; i < CONN_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- hlist_for_each_entry(con, h, &connection_hash[i], list) {
- if (con->sctp_assoc == assoc_id) {
- mutex_unlock(&connections_lock);
- return con;
- }
+ hash_for_each(connection_hash, i, h, con, list) {
+ if (con->sctp_assoc == assoc_id) {
+ mutex_unlock(&connections_lock);
+ return con;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&connections_lock);
@@ -1638,7 +1625,7 @@ static void free_conn(struct connection *con)
close_connection(con, true);
if (con->othercon)
kmem_cache_free(con_cache, con->othercon);
- hlist_del(&con->list);
+ hash_del(&con->list);
kmem_cache_free(con_cache, con);
}

@@ -1667,10 +1654,6 @@ int dlm_lowcomms_start(void)
{
int error = -EINVAL;
struct connection *con;
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < CONN_HASH_SIZE; i++)
- INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&connection_hash[i]);

init_local();
if (!dlm_local_count) {
--
1.7.12.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/