RE: [PATCH] To crash dump, we need keep other memory type except E820_RAM, because other type come from BIOS or firmware is used by other code(for example: PCI_MMCONFIG).

[H. Peter Anvin]

2) would make most sense to me, but I'd be okay with 3) as well.

"Zhang, Jun" <jun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Hello, Anvin
>
>I want to explain why I modify in this place. In kexec, it pass three
>parameters, memmap=exactmap memmap=544K@64K memmap=64964K@32768K
>I think my patch modify the least code. 
>Actually, there are some choise to fix it. 
>1)  my patch.
>2)  modify kexec, only pass two parameters -- memmap=544K@64K
>memmap=64964K@32768K, in kernel setup_memory_map, we can remove RAM
>range.
>3)  add extra optional, like memmap=REMOVERAM
>
>Which one do you like? Maybe you have better solution, please share it.
>Thanks!
>
>Best Regards!
>
>Jun Zhang
>Inet: 8821-4273
>Dir.Tel: 86-21-6116-4273
>Email: jun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@xxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 1:39 PM
>To: Zhang, Jun
>Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; Andrew Morton;
>Fleming, Matt; Paul Gortmaker; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] To crash dump, we need keep other memory type
>except E820_RAM, because other type come from BIOS or firmware is used
>by other code(for example: PCI_MMCONFIG).
>
>On 10/30/2012 10:22 PM, Zhang, Jun wrote:
>> Hello, Anvin
>>    You are right. Thanks!
>>
>> Hello, All
>>    Please review it again. Thanks!
>>
>>  From bf7506ac7e9ce0df0b915164dbb7a6d858ef2e40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 
>> 2001
>> From: jzha144 <jun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:51:18 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] When we are doing a crash dump, we still need
>non-E820_RAM
>>   memory type address information in order to do I/O. so only
>>   remove all RAM ranges which need to be dumped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: jzha144 <jun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |    9 +++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c index 
>> df06ade..77be839 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> @@ -851,6 +851,15 @@ static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *p)
>>   		 * reset.
>>   		 */
>>   		saved_max_pfn = e820_end_of_ram_pfn();
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * We are doing a crash dump, so remove all RAM ranges
>> +		 * as they are the ones that need to be dumped.
>> +		 * We still need all non-RAM information in order to do I/O.
>> +		 */
>> +		e820_remove_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM, 1);
>> +		userdef = 1;
>> +		return 0;
>>   #endif
>>   		e820.nr_map = 0;
>>   		userdef = 1;
>>
>
>The code is still wrong...
>
>	-hpa
>
>
>--
>H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. 
>I don't speak on their behalf.

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/