Re: [PATCHv7 4/4] virtio_console: Add support for remoteproc serial

[Amit Shah]

On (Tue) 23 Oct 2012 [12:17:49], Rusty Russell wrote:
> sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > @@ -1415,7 +1524,16 @@ static void remove_port_data(struct port *port)
> >  
> >  	/* Remove buffers we queued up for the Host to send us data in. */
> >  	while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq)))
> > -		free_buf(buf);
> > +		free_buf(buf, true);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Remove buffers from out queue for rproc-serial. We cannot afford
> > +	 * to leak any DMA mem, so reclaim this memory even if this might be
> > +	 * racy for the remote processor.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (is_rproc_serial(port->portdev->vdev))
> > +		while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->out_vq)))
> > +			free_buf(buf, true);
> >  }
> 
> This seems wrong; either this is needed even if !is_rproc_serial(), or
> it's not necessary as the out_vq is empty.
> 
> Every path I can see has the device reset (in which case the queues
> should not be active), or we got a VIRTIO_CONSOLE_PORT_REMOVE event (in
> which case, the same).
> 
> I think we can have non-blocking writes which could leave buffers in
> out_vq: Amit?

Those get 'reclaimed' just above this hunk:


static void remove_port_data(struct port *port)
{
	struct port_buffer *buf;

	/* Remove unused data this port might have received. */
	discard_port_data(port);

	reclaim_consumed_buffers(port);

	/* Remove buffers we queued up for the Host to send us data in. */
	while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq)))
	      free_buf(buf, true);

  ...




> >  static void __exit fini(void)
> >  {
> > +	reclaim_dma_bufs();
> 
> Hmm, you didn't protect it here anyway...
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

		Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/