Re: [PATCH] IRQ CORE: irq_work_queue function return value notused.

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 22:24 +0900, anish kumar wrote:
> > From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
> > it is better to just make it void.
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Peter, like to take this patch? Or is there a reason you have for
> irq_work_queue() returning a value?
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> > Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/irq_work.c |    6 +++---
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> > index 1588e3b..a85c4b3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> > @@ -79,17 +79,17 @@ static void __irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> >   *
> >   * Can be re-enqueued while the callback is still in progress.
> >   */
> > -bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> > +void irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> >  {
> >  	if (!irq_work_claim(work)) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Already enqueued, can't do!
> >  		 */
> > -		return false;
> > +		return;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	__irq_work_queue(work);
> > -	return true;
> > +	return;

And while at it please zap that pointless "return;" statement.

> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_queue);
> >  
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/