Re: [RFC v4+ hot_track 03/19] vfs: add I/O frequency update function

[Zhi Yong Wu]

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 12:30 +0800, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>   Add some util helpers to update access frequencies
>> for one file or its range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/hot_tracking.c            |  179 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/hot_tracking.h            |    7 ++
>>  include/linux/hot_tracking.h |    2 +
>>  3 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/hot_tracking.c b/fs/hot_tracking.c
>> index 68591f0..0a7d9a3 100644
>> --- a/fs/hot_tracking.c
>> +++ b/fs/hot_tracking.c
>> @@ -172,6 +172,137 @@ static void hot_inode_tree_exit(struct hot_info *root)
>>       }
>>  }
>>
>> +struct hot_inode_item
>> +*hot_inode_item_find(struct hot_info *root, u64 ino)
>> +{
>> +     struct hot_inode_item *he;
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +again:
>> +     spin_lock(&root->lock);
>> +     he = radix_tree_lookup(&root->hot_inode_tree, ino);
>> +     if (he) {
>> +             kref_get(&he->hot_inode.refs);
>> +             spin_unlock(&root->lock);
>> +             return he;
>> +     }
>> +     spin_unlock(&root->lock);
>> +
>> +     he = kmem_cache_zalloc(hot_inode_item_cachep,
>> +                             GFP_KERNEL | GFP_NOFS);
> This doesn't look quite right... which of these two did you mean? I
> assume probably just GFP_NOFS
Yes, good catch, thanks.
>
>> +     if (!he)
>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> +     hot_inode_item_init(he, ino, &root->hot_inode_tree);
>> +
>> +     ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
>> +     if (ret) {
>> +             kmem_cache_free(hot_inode_item_cachep, he);
>> +             return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     spin_lock(&root->lock);
>> +     ret = radix_tree_insert(&root->hot_inode_tree, ino, he);
>> +     if (ret == -EEXIST) {
>> +             kmem_cache_free(hot_inode_item_cachep, he);
>> +             spin_unlock(&root->lock);
>> +             radix_tree_preload_end();
>> +             goto again;
>> +     }
>> +     spin_unlock(&root->lock);
>> +     radix_tree_preload_end();
>> +
>> +     kref_get(&he->hot_inode.refs);
>> +     return he;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hot_inode_item_find);
>> +
>> +static struct hot_range_item
>> +*hot_range_item_find(struct hot_inode_item *he,
>> +                     u32 start)
>> +{
>> +     struct hot_range_item *hr;
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +again:
>> +     spin_lock(&he->lock);
>> +     hr = radix_tree_lookup(&he->hot_range_tree, start);
>> +     if (hr) {
>> +             kref_get(&hr->hot_range.refs);
>> +             spin_unlock(&he->lock);
>> +             return hr;
>> +     }
>> +     spin_unlock(&he->lock);
>> +
>> +     hr = kmem_cache_zalloc(hot_range_item_cachep,
>> +                             GFP_KERNEL | GFP_NOFS);
> Likewise, here too.
ditto
>
> Steve.
>
>
>



-- 
Regards,

Zhi Yong Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/