Re: [PATCH 6/9] cgroup_freezer: make freezer->state mask of flags
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Date: Wed Nov 07 2012 - 23:38:09 EST
(2012/11/03 17:38), Tejun Heo wrote:
freezer->state was an enum value - one of THAWED, FREEZING and FROZEN.
As the scheduled full hierarchy support requires more than one
freezing condition, switch it to mask of flags. If FREEZING is not
set, it's thawed. FREEZING is set if freezing or frozen. If frozen,
both FREEZING and FROZEN are set. Now that tasks can be attached to
an already frozen cgroup, this also makes freezing condition checks
more natural.
This patch doesn't introduce any behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
index 2690830..e76aa9f 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
@@ -22,15 +22,14 @@
#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
-enum freezer_state {
- CGROUP_THAWED = 0,
- CGROUP_FREEZING,
- CGROUP_FROZEN,
+enum freezer_state_flags {
+ CGROUP_FREEZING = (1 << 1), /* this freezer is freezing */
+ CGROUP_FROZEN = (1 << 3), /* this and its descendants frozen */
};
struct freezer {
struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
- enum freezer_state state;
+ unsigned int state;
spinlock_t lock;
};
@@ -48,12 +47,10 @@ static inline struct freezer *task_freezer(struct task_struct *task)
bool cgroup_freezing(struct task_struct *task)
{
- enum freezer_state state;
bool ret;
rcu_read_lock();
- state = task_freezer(task)->state;
- ret = state == CGROUP_FREEZING || state == CGROUP_FROZEN;
+ ret = task_freezer(task)->state & CGROUP_FREEZING;
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
@@ -63,10 +60,13 @@ bool cgroup_freezing(struct task_struct *task)
* cgroups_write_string() limits the size of freezer state strings to
* CGROUP_LOCAL_BUFFER_SIZE
*/
-static const char *freezer_state_strs[] = {
- "THAWED",
- "FREEZING",
- "FROZEN",
+static const char *freezer_state_strs(unsigned int state)
+{
+ if (state & CGROUP_FROZEN)
+ return "FROZEN";
+ if (state & CGROUP_FREEZING)
+ return "FREEZING";
+ return "THAWED";
};
/*
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *freezer_create(struct cgroup *cgroup)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
spin_lock_init(&freezer->lock);
- freezer->state = CGROUP_THAWED;
return &freezer->css;
}
@@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ static void freezer_destroy(struct cgroup *cgroup)
{
struct freezer *freezer = cgroup_freezer(cgroup);
- if (freezer->state != CGROUP_THAWED)
+ if (freezer->state & CGROUP_FREEZING)
atomic_dec(&system_freezing_cnt);
kfree(freezer);
}
@@ -129,15 +128,13 @@ static void freezer_attach(struct cgroup *new_cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
* Tasks in @tset are on @new_cgrp but may not conform to its
* current state before executing the following - !frozen tasks may
* be visible in a FROZEN cgroup and frozen tasks in a THAWED one.
- * This means that, to determine whether to freeze, one should test
- * whether the state equals THAWED.
*/
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, new_cgrp, tset) {
- if (freezer->state == CGROUP_THAWED) {
+ if (!(freezer->state & CGROUP_FREEZING)) {
__thaw_task(task);
} else {
freeze_task(task);
- freezer->state = CGROUP_FREEZING;
+ freezer->state &= ~CGROUP_FROZEN;
}
}
@@ -159,11 +156,7 @@ static void freezer_fork(struct task_struct *task)
goto out;
spin_lock_irq(&freezer->lock);
- /*
- * @task might have been just migrated into a FROZEN cgroup. Test
- * equality with THAWED. Read the comment in freezer_attach().
- */
- if (freezer->state != CGROUP_THAWED)
+ if (freezer->state & CGROUP_FREEZING)
freeze_task(task);
spin_unlock_irq(&freezer->lock);
out:
@@ -184,7 +177,8 @@ static void update_if_frozen(struct freezer *freezer)
struct cgroup_iter it;
struct task_struct *task;
- if (freezer->state != CGROUP_FREEZING)
+ if (!(freezer->state & CGROUP_FREEZING) ||
+ (freezer->state & CGROUP_FROZEN))
return;
Hmm....
How about
enum {
__CGROUP_FREEZING,
__CGROUP_FROZEN,
};
#define CGROUP_FREEZER_STATE_MASK 0x3
#define CGROUP_FREEZER_STATE(state) ((state) & CGROUP_FREEZER_STATE_MASK)
#define CGROUP_THAW(state) (CGROUP_FREEZER_STATE(state) == 0)
#define CGROUP_FREEZING(state) (CGROUP_FREEZER_STATE(state) == __CGROUP_FREEZING)
#define CGROUP_FROZEN(state)\
(CGROUP_FREEZER_STATE(state) == (__CGROUP_FREEZING | __CGROUP_FROZEN))
cgroup_iter_start(cgroup, &it);
@@ -202,7 +196,7 @@ static void update_if_frozen(struct freezer *freezer)
}
}
- freezer->state = CGROUP_FROZEN;
+ freezer->state |= CGROUP_FROZEN;
notyet:
cgroup_iter_end(cgroup, &it);
}
@@ -211,14 +205,14 @@ static int freezer_read(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cft,
struct seq_file *m)
{
struct freezer *freezer = cgroup_freezer(cgroup);
- enum freezer_state state;
+ unsigned int state;
spin_lock_irq(&freezer->lock);
update_if_frozen(freezer);
state = freezer->state;
spin_unlock_irq(&freezer->lock);
- seq_puts(m, freezer_state_strs[state]);
+ seq_puts(m, freezer_state_strs(state));
seq_putc(m, '\n');
return 0;
}
@@ -258,14 +252,14 @@ static void freezer_apply_state(struct freezer *freezer, bool freeze)
lockdep_assert_held(&freezer->lock);
if (freeze) {
- if (freezer->state == CGROUP_THAWED)
+ if (!(freezer->state & CGROUP_FREEZING))
atomic_inc(&system_freezing_cnt);
- freezer->state = CGROUP_FREEZING;
+ freezer->state |= CGROUP_FREEZING;
freeze_cgroup(freezer);
} else {
- if (freezer->state != CGROUP_THAWED)
+ if (freezer->state & CGROUP_FREEZING)
atomic_dec(&system_freezing_cnt);
- freezer->state = CGROUP_THAWED;
+ freezer->state &= ~(CGROUP_FREEZING | CGROUP_FROZEN);
unfreeze_cgroup(freezer);
}
}
@@ -290,9 +284,9 @@ static int freezer_write(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cft,
{
bool freeze;
- if (strcmp(buffer, freezer_state_strs[CGROUP_THAWED]) == 0)
+ if (strcmp(buffer, freezer_state_strs(0)) == 0)
Can't we have a name for "0" ?
freeze = false;
- else if (strcmp(buffer, freezer_state_strs[CGROUP_FROZEN]) == 0)
+ else if (strcmp(buffer, freezer_state_strs(CGROUP_FROZEN)) == 0)
freeze = true;
else
return -EINVAL;
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/