Re: [PATCH v3 8/7] pppoatm: fix missing wakeup in pppoatm_send()

From: David Woodhouse
Date: Sat Nov 10 2012 - 02:36:14 EST


On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:30 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> I don't know what to do with this patch because I don't have any
> context whatsoever.

I sent two replies to Krzysztof's series starting with [PATCH v3 0/7]
in Message-Id: <1352240222-363-1-git-send-email-krzysiek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The first was pointing out a problem; the second was a [PATCH v3 8/7]
which fixed the problem I'd pointed out. It wasn't clear to me that more
context would be needed. In particular, [PATCH v3 8/7] was a reply to
0/7, just as the other patches ##1-7 had been.

> So I'm tossing it, please resubmit it when it's meant to be
> applied, and with some context.

That's OK. I was hoping for an ack from Chas and/or Krzysztof,
especially as I hadn't tested my patch. So hopefully there'll be a v4
series of 8 patches, including this one... and all from the same person,
which makes it slightly easier to follow :)

--
dwmw2

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature