Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation
From: James Bottomley
Date: Sun Nov 11 2012 - 13:22:34 EST
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 10:15 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> James wrote:
> >> [I'd like to see] a genuine public apology for the libel...
> >> Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of
> this
> >> nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.
Hey that's a complete misrepresentation. I expressed no such opinion in
the email.
What I said was:
> I would really appreciate it if the next email I see from you on this
> subject is either
>
> 1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case
> we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or
> 2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to
> prevail on RTS to accept.
>
> Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this
> nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.
That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the
facts. It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference
for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/