Re: [PATCH] ARM: add get_user() support for 8 byte types

[Rob Clark]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:17:33PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark <rob@xxxxxx>
>>
>> A new atomic modeset/pageflip ioctl being developed in DRM requires
>> get_user() to work for 64bit types (in addition to just put_user()).
>
> NAK.
>
> (I did write a better email explaining all the ins and outs of why this
> won't work and why 64-bit get_user isn't possible, but my editor crapped
> out and lost all that well written message; I don't fancy typing it all
> out again.)
>
> Nevertheless,
> int test_ptr(unsigned int **v, unsigned int **p)
> {
>         return get_user(*v, p);
> }
>
> produces a warning, and you can't get away from that if you stick 64-bit
> support into get_user().

Actually, it seems like using 'register typeof(x) __r2 asm("r2");'
does avoid that warning..

I don't know if that was the only argument against 64-bit get_user().
But it will at least be inconvenient that get_user() works for 64bit
on x86 but not arm..

BR,
-R

> Sorry, 64-bit get_user() is a no-no.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/