Re: [RFC PATCH 00/31] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing V2

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > I'd also like to add another, structural side note: you 
> > mixed new vm-stats bits into the whole queue, needlessly 
> > blowing up the size and the mm/ specific portions of the 
> > tree. I'd suggest to post and keep those bits separately, 
> > preferably on top of what we have already once it has 
> > settled down. I'm keeping the 'perf bench numa' bits 
> > separate as well.
> 
> The stats part are fairly late in the queue. I noticed they 
> break build for !CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA but it was trivially 
> resolved. [...]

Ok - the vm-stats bits are the last larger item remaining that 
I've seen - could you please redo any of your changes on top of 
the latest tip:numa/core tree, to make them easier for me to 
pick up?

Your tree is slowly becoming a rebase of tip:numa/core and that 
will certainly cause problems.

I'll backmerge any delta patches and rebase as necessary - but 
please do them as deltas on top of tip:numa/core to make things 
reviewable and easier to merge:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git numa/core

Thanks!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/