Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mfd: add TI TPS80031 mfd core driver

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:01:26PM -0500, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> >This does not seem sensible.  Why would this be optional if it is
> >useful?  In any case, what you're doing in the driver here is clearly
> >not the way forward.

> I was thinking  of adding wake_enable in struct regmap_irq_chip and
> decide the wake support based on the value if wake_enable true or
> wake_base is non-zero. then wake support should be enable.
> The wake register write will happen only when wake_base is non-zero.

But to repeat my question why would this be optional?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature