[ 10/57] target: Fix incorrect usage of nested IRQ spinlocks in ABORT_TASK path

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Nov 14 2012 - 23:25:38 EST


3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Steve Hodgson <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit ab74b3d62f05192bf8fb8f169e7999d1183b2e08 upstream.

This patch changes core_tmr_abort_task() to use spin_lock -> spin_unlock
around se_cmd->t_state_lock while spin_lock_irqsave is held via
se_sess->sess_cmd_lock.

Signed-off-by: Steve Hodgson <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
@@ -140,15 +140,15 @@ void core_tmr_abort_task(
printk("ABORT_TASK: Found referenced %s task_tag: %u\n",
se_cmd->se_tfo->get_fabric_name(), ref_tag);

- spin_lock_irq(&se_cmd->t_state_lock);
+ spin_lock(&se_cmd->t_state_lock);
if (se_cmd->transport_state & CMD_T_COMPLETE) {
printk("ABORT_TASK: ref_tag: %u already complete, skipping\n", ref_tag);
- spin_unlock_irq(&se_cmd->t_state_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&se_cmd->t_state_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&se_sess->sess_cmd_lock, flags);
goto out;
}
se_cmd->transport_state |= CMD_T_ABORTED;
- spin_unlock_irq(&se_cmd->t_state_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&se_cmd->t_state_lock);

list_del_init(&se_cmd->se_cmd_list);
kref_get(&se_cmd->cmd_kref);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/